For the past half a century a genocide has been taking place, this genocide does not have men with guns and machetes slaughtering women and children. No, this genocide is taking place without blood being spilled, but make no mistake, this genocide will lead to a large part of earth's genetics being wiped out. This genocide has taken place through the use of weaponized migration.
Since the latter half of the 20th century Europe has been subjected to a demographic crisis. It's people and unique genetic makeup slowly being dissolved out of existence. In this article I am going to explain how in just a few generations an entire population of people can be removed from existence without the firing of a single bullet. How tolerating the importation of an invigorated migrant population into the heartland of a complacent native populace will within a few decades seal the fate of those natives, tearing out their family tree by its roots and destroying them completely, severing the thread of destiny that goes back through their ancestors for time immemorial.
This has happened countless times in the past and unlike the fall of Rome or the destruction of Carthage, these dead civilizations are forgotten to history because their names were not even passed down through the generations via the lips of those who descend from the triumphant tribe.
I will be going over a few scenarios to illustrate how migration when done in even a measured manner or stopped altogether can still lead to the destruction of peoples. In the following examples the unit of measurement I will be using is the fertility rate. This measurement is taken by counting the number of children born to each female. It is women that limit the growth of a population because they must carry a child for nine months until it is ready to be born and they cannot be reimpregnated until they have done so, men on the other hand can get countless women pregnant in quick succession. A tribe that had all of its men killed can be reborn from a single surviving man as he can very quickly impregnate all the women of his tribe, while if all the women except one are killed then that tribe can only recover one member per every nine months at a maximum.
In order for a population to have a replacement level of reproduction, the fertility rate must be 2.0. Every woman must have two children to replace herself and the father of the children. If a population has a fertility rate of 3.0, that means each woman is having three children and so the population will grow, if the fertility rate is 1.0 then the population will shrink as each woman is only having one child, once the mother and father die the population will be lower.
To see why immigration is an issue you must look at the relative fertility of the two groups, the natives and the migrants. If the natives have a replacement fertility, but the migrants are above replacement, then in just a few generations the migrants will outnumber the natives. If you live in a democracy, as is the case in any modern western nation, then that also means that the migrants will now have the majority vote and thus be the decision-makers. This change can take place without a single bullet being fired.
Scenario 1: A refugee crisis
Let us begin by imagining a village of 1000 people. 80% of this village is the native population and 20% of this village recently arrived from a war-torn neighbor. These 200 migrants came as a single wave and now there is no more additional migration. Assuming a replacement fertility of 2.0 for the natives and fertility rate of 3.0 for the migrants, then this means both populations will replace themselves with the first 2.0, but only the migrants will grow with their additional 1.0 fertility. Within just a few decades of this, the native population will become outnumbered by the migrants despite maintaining a replacement fertility.
Generation 1 | 20 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 300 people.
Natives are now 72.7% of the population. Migrants are now 27.3%
Generation 2 | 40 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 450 people.
Natives are now 64% of the population. Migrants are now 36%
Generation 3 | 60 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 675 people.
Natives are now 54.2% of the population. Migrants are now 45.8%
Generation 4 | 80 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 1012 people.
Natives are now 44.1% of the population. Migrants are now 55.9%
Generation 5 | 100 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 1519 people.
Natives are now 34.5% of the population. Migrants are now 65.5%
Generation 6 | 120 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 2278 people.
Natives are now 26% of the population. Migrants are now 74%
Generation 7 | 140 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 3417 people.
Natives are now 19% of the population. Migrants are now 81%
Generation 8 | 160 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 5126 people.
Natives are now 13.5% of the population. Migrants are now 86.5%
Generation 9 | 180 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 7689 people.
Natives are now 9.4% of the population. Migrants are now 90.6%
Generation 10 | 200 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 11533 people.
Natives are now 6.5% of the population. Migrants are now 93.5%
A visual representation of replacement migration without ongoing migration.
Notice how quickly the native population becomes a minority, the transformation takes place in a mere 60 years. However, this example doesn’t tell the full story, the full story is far, far, worse. The example we just observed assumes that the natives will continue to breed at replacement, that there will be no more immigration, that there will be zero interbreeding, and that practices like polygamy are not taking place.
I chose to start the examples using a proportion of 80% native to 20% migrants because that is roughly analogous to what most of the western world is approaching. Germany has a foreign-born migrant population of 15.6%. The UK has a foreign-born migrant population of 13.4%. Sweden has a foreign-born population of 18.3% and France has a foreign-born population of 12.3%. (Source)
It should be noted that these statistics are already skewed because they are already half a decade old and it only counts those who physically immigrated themselves, it doesn't take into account the children of those who immigrated in the half a century after world war two. If two Pakistanis immigrated to the UK in the 1970s and had five children, who had five children of their own 20 years later, then the above statistics only take into account the original two migrants, although there would now be thirty-two people of Pakistani origin. Those thirty-two are counted as "native" because they were born on UK soil despite no sensible person believing that merely being born in a certain geographical location makes you a native of that nation.
You may have seen articles claiming that white Britons will be a minority by 2066, well 2066 minus the current year (2020) is 46 years, this is substantially sooner than what we calculated above, why? Let's look at the next two scenarios which abandon the optimism and are a little more accurate to reality.
Scenario 2: Cumulative immigration
The above scenario only considers what would happen if you took a single wave of migrants and then shut the borders, the following example also adds an additional 1% of the population in additional migration every year.
Generation 1 | 20 years after beginning
The population is now 1100 people.
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 300 people.
Natives are now 72% of the population. Migrants are now 27%.
Generation 2 | 40 years after beginning
The population is now 1310 people.
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 510 people.
Natives are now 61% of the population. Migrants are now 38%.
Generation 3 | 60 years after beginning
The population is now 1667 people.
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 867 people.
Natives are now 47% of the population. Migrants are now 52%.
Generation 4 | 80 years after beginning
The population is now 2274 people.
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 1474 people.
Natives are now 35% of the population. Migrants are now 64%.
Generation 5 | 100 years after beginning
The population is now 3306 people.
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 2506 people.
Natives are now 24% of the population. Migrants are now 75%.
Generation 6 | 120 years after beginning
The population is now 5060 people.
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 4260 people.
Natives are now 15% of the population. Migrants are now 84%.
Generation 7 | 140 years after beginning
The population is now 8041 people.
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 7241 people.
Natives are now 9% of the population. Migrants are now 90%.
Generation 8 | 160 years after beginning
The population is now 13110 people.
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 12310 people.
Natives are now 6% of the population. Migrants are now 93%.
Generation 9 | 180 years after beginning
The population is now 21727 people.
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 20927 people.
Natives are now 3% of the population. Migrants are now 96%.
Generation 10 | 200 years after beginning
The population is now 36376 people.
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 35576 people.
Natives are now 2% of the population. Migrants are now 97%.
A visual representation of replacement migration with ongoing migration.
As you can see the final percentage doesn't change by more than a few points but there are substantially more migrants by the end of it. This scenario just outlines that the ongoing migration is not actually the problem that needs to be tackled. Ongoing migration does need to be stopped, but is no longer the root issue. Stopping ongoing migration is a necessary but not sufficient step in preventing the genocide of the people who maintain western civilization.
We have, up until now, not even considered a native population with a negative birth rate, that is to say a birth-rate that is below the replacement rate of 2.0. This is the case for the entire western world. Germany has a national fertility rate of 1.6. The UK has a national fertility rate of 1.78 and both Sweden and France have a national fertility rate of 1.87 (Source). Every year, more Europeans die than are born. There is not a single western nation that is above replacement.
If we take the original example and adjust it for a negative birth rate of 1.62, which is the average birth-rate of the west as a whole and NOT just the natives. We must not forget that the actual native fertility rate will be lower than the number we have chosen due to migrants having a far higher fertility rate even when they are in western nations and so we are already making things look more favorable than they actually are, but putting that aside we will now look at how truly perilous our situation is.
Scenario 3: Ongoing Migration + Population Decline = Total Demographic Replacement
Generation 1 | 20 years after beginning
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 300 people.
Natives are now 72.72% of the population. Migrants are now 27.27%
Generation 2 | 40 years after beginning
The native population is now 648 people. The migrant population is now 510 people.
Natives are now 55.95% of the population. Migrants are now 44.04%
Generation 3 | 60 years after beginning
The native population is now 524 people. The migrant population is now 867 people.
Natives are now 37.71% of the population. Migrants are now 62.28%
Generation 4 | 80 years after beginning
The native population is now 425 people. The migrant population is now 1474 people.
Natives are now 22.38% of the population. Migrants are now 77.61%
Generation 5 | 100 years after beginning
The native population is now 344 people. The migrant population is now 2506 people.
Natives are now 12.08% of the population. Migrants are now 87.91%
Generation 6 | 120 years after beginning
The native population is now 278 people. The migrant population is now 4260 people.
Natives are now 6.14% of the population. Migrants are now 93.85%
Generation 7 | 140 years after beginning
The native population is now 225 people. The migrant population is now 7241 people.
Natives are now 3.02% of the population. Migrants are now 96.97%
Generation 8 | 160 years after beginning
The native population is now 183 people. The migrant population is now 12310 people.
Natives are now 1.46% of the population. Migrants are now 98.53%
Generation 9 | 180 years after beginning
The native population is now 148 people. The migrant population is now 20927 people.
Natives are now 0.70% of the population. Migrants are now 99.29%
Generation 10 | 200 years after beginning
The native population is now 120 people. The migrant population is now 35576 people.
Natives are now 0.33% of the population. Migrants are now 99.66%
A visual representation of replacement migration with ongoing migration and native fertility decline.
There is your genocide. The natives are destroyed. Gone. Dead. That's all it took. But I regret to inform you that we are not done yet, we have one last scenario to consider and that is the inevitable interbreeding that will occur between natives and foreigners especially when the incoming group begins to outnumber the natives and they are left with no other options.
If the native population interbreeds with the incoming population the demographic replacement is yet again hastened, again this is a serious issue when the incoming group is much larger than the native group, meaning that they can continually pour more and more genetic material in. It is a genocide by genetic suffocation. This is exactly the threat facing the European people. We are roughly 8% of the population on the entire planet. There are less than 1 billion Europeans, approximately 800 million worldwide, there are more Indians (1.2 billion) on this planet than every single European ethnic group combined, there are more Chinese (1.35 billion) on this planet than every single European ethnic group combined, there are more Africans (1.2 billion) on this planet than every single European ethnic group combined. We are the minority.
Scenario 4: Interbreeding
Now watch as the native population of Europe is bred away with a rate of 5% interbreeding per generation. That is just 1/20 women choosing a foreign man. Let's see what comes of those who attempted to marry into the invading population.
Generation 1 | 20 years
The native population is now 800 people. The migrant population is now 300 people. The mixed-race population is now 0
Natives are now 72.72% of the population. Migrants are 27.27%. The mixed-race population is 0%.
Generation 2 | 40 years
The native population is now 648 people. The migrant population is now 510 people. The mixed-race population is now 32
Natives are now 57.56% of the population. Migrants are 45.30%. The mixed-race population is 2.87%.
Generation 3 | 60 years
The native population is now 524 people. The migrant population is now 867 people. The mixed-race population is now 26
Natives are now 38.43% of the population. Migrants are 63.48%. The mixed-race population is 1.92%.
Generation 4 | 80 years
The native population is now 425 people. The migrant population is now 1474 people. The mixed-race population is now 21
Natives are now 22.64% of the population. Migrants are 78.49%. The mixed-race population is 1.13%.
Generation 5 | 100 years
The native population is now 344 people. The migrant population is now 2506 people. The mixed-race population is now 17
Natives are now 12.15% of the population. Migrants are 88.45%. The mixed-race population is 0.60%.
Generation 6 | 120 years
The native population is now 278 people. The migrant population is now 4260 people. The mixed-race population is now 13
Natives are now 6.16% of the population. Migrants are 94.14%. The mixed-race population is 0.30%.
Generation 7 | 140 years
The native population is now 225 people. The migrant population is now 7241 people. The mixed-race population is now 11
Natives are now 3.03% of the population. Migrants are 97.12%. The mixed-race population is 0.15%.
Generation 8 | 160 years
The native population is now 183 people. The migrant population is now 12310 people. The mixed-race population is now 9
Natives are now 1.46% of the population. Migrants are 98.60%. The mixed-race population is 0.07%.
Generation 9 | 180 years
The native population is now 148 people. The migrant population is now 20927 people. The mixed-race population is now 7
Natives are now 0.70% of the population. Migrants are 99.33%. The mixed-race population is 0.03%.
Generation 10| (200 years
The native population is now 120 people. The migrant population is now 35576 people. The mixed-race population is now 6
Natives are now 0.33% of the population. Migrants are 99.68%. The mixed-race population is 0.01%.
A visual representation of replacement migration with ongoing migration, native fertility decline, and interbreeding.
Even those who attempt to preserve their genes by integrating with the incoming migrants will be snuffed out because there simply isn't enough of the native population to compete with the migrant inflow. The only possible way for this to work would be for a native man to impregnate as many migrant women as possible, a scenario which becomes less and less likely as the migrant men begin to outnumber the native men. Anything short of that and the natives just disappear, they are snuffed out entirely. The natives currently in that situation are the European people. No matter how many children we have, we cannot hope to catch up to the rest of the world, we cannot compete with a billion Indians, a billion Chinese, and a billion Africans, all populations that are going to skyrocket over the next century.
This is the scenario that leads to our destruction. That unbroken chain of father and son going back further than any of us can even comprehend will be shattered and we were never asked, we were never consulted. This fate was pushed upon us with no justification besides vague notions of diversity and multiculturalism, our altruism and compassion taken and used against as a weapon that will lead to our destruction. This is what happens when your government would rather import labour and consumers rather than create its own. This is what happens when your government betrays you.
We have been led by people we falsely believed to be beneficent to our demise, and if the new arrivals had the ability to behave themselves and contain their violent tendencies then within 200 years this planet would have belonged to them. But that, white man, is your salvation, the undesirable behaviour of migrants has severed as a catalyst to begin a European awakening. The behaviour of the "new Europeans" is so egregious even the most well-behaved citizen of our multicultural liberal democratic paradise cannot ignore it. Make no mistake, there is violence in this genocide, but for now, it is well hidden and only occasionally granted a place in the spotlight by a reluctant media, but when they start to outnumber us the machetes will be sharpened when economic turmoil comes to us, then they will already be organised along racial lines ready to perpetrate violence against us.
Europeans are finally beginning to realize what has been forced upon them, the sheer size of the task. They have finally realized that it does not matter how much you give, you will never be able to satisfy the elite or the migrants. They want it all. Your taxes, your land, your children, your future.
It is time to say “NO!”, it is time for us to stop the inflow of migrants, protect our borders, remove all of those who would do us harm. It is time for Europeans to take the fate of their nations back into their own hands. Our ancestors gifted us these prosperous nations, but we didn’t get these gifts unconditionally, with these gifts we were given responsibilities, the responsibility to safeguard our treasured nations and hand them down to our children.